What separates great creative work from average work isn't technology, but human judgment, according to the D&AD AI & Creativity Report 2026: The Cost of the Shortcut.
The report, sponsored by Shutterstock Studios, draws on 197 in-depth conversations with global creative leaders from 30 countries, alongside an analysis of more than 10,000 D&AD Award entries.
It found AI has made creative work faster and cheaper, but using it as a shortcut produces average output, while skilled human judgment using AI to sharpen craft, rather than replace it, delivers the real value.
The research found entry-level jobs, where people learn to build judgment, are disappearing, while AI is absorbing repetitive tasks, eliminating the training ground that builds judgment for future creative leaders.
The study identifies six areas where leaders can act to build a stronger, more intentional industry.
The proportion of D&AD Award entries declaring the use of AI more than doubled year-on-year, reaching 27.6% in 2026.
Generative AI was used in 56.2% of AI-declaring entries overall, compared with 44.7% of AI-declaring Pencil winners, alongside a proportional rise in assistive AI among winners.
The report found that while AI is increasingly part of the creative process, its use alone does not translate into creative excellence, with human judgment, originality and craft remaining critical at the highest levels.
AI can drive the most impactful results when working invisibly beneath the idea, pointing to projects including "Caption with Intention" and "PainVisible" as examples of AI driving inclusivity and precision at scale.
On originality, the report found AI trends towards the average when left alone, with award-winning work emerging where specialist AI tools were paired with human judgment and craft.
On talent, organisations face a choice between using AI to replace learning opportunities or redesigning junior roles around critique, taste and cultural awareness.
On leadership, the report found creative excellence cannot be delegated to AI, with organisations pulling ahead led by people actively shaping how AI is adopted, governed and used.
David Patton, CEO of D&AD, said AI had changed what bad creative work looks like.
"It's no longer lazy or derivative in any obvious way – it's competent, polished, and generic, and it's the default output for anyone, anywhere,” he said.
“The real problem sits one step earlier: how do you train someone to tell competent from excellent, when competent is now the easy default everywhere they look?
“This report isn't just a diagnostic of risk. It's D&AD planting a flag – not for the tools, or against them, but for the human judgment they can't replace," Patton said.
Have something to say on this? Share your views in the comments section below. Or if you have a news story or tip-off, drop us a line at adnews@yaffa.com.au
Sign up to the AdNews newsletter, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter for breaking stories and campaigns throughout the day.